(1+p)(1-p)

I wonder how many people this week realized that “ten percent down” followed by “ten percent up” does not equal “no change.” Probably a few. And how many realized that “ten percent down” followed by “ten percent up” is the same as “ten percent up” followed by “ten percent down”? Or that up 5 percent, down 3 percent, up 2 percent, down 8 percent, and down 8 percent in that order is the same as down 8 percent, up 2 percent, down 3 percent, up 5 percent, down 8 percent in that order? Commutativity is cool. Yes, I am easily amused.

7 Replies to “(1+p)(1-p)”

  1. This is exactly why I don’t like descriptions of change that are posed solely in terms of percent change – I think they’re hard to understand. Harder to understand than differential equations, I would argue.

  2. “I wonder how many people this week realized…”
    We have a good swath of our country who believes that a large part of the rest of the world is praying against “our god” and “our god” should take action against those who think they are bigger than “our god.” (Arnold Conrad.) (Kind of sounds like the my-dad-is-bigger-than-yours argument.) The same ones who think Sarah Palin would make a great president should it come to that. So, I’m starting to believe the collective IQ is much, much lower than I had imagined. I doubt many understand commutative property at all. (A few years ago I read about a test that was given to a number of top executives in the financial sector that asked to solve the most basic quadratic equation. Overwhelmingly the executives complained that they should not be expected to know such “advanced” concepts.)

  3. And yet if the stock market randomly goes up/down by 10% each with probability 1/2, the expected value is exactly its current value. Math is weird.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *