I have always been a daydreamer. There isn’t a place or distraction in the world which can keep me from somehow drifting off into a daydreaming state of mind. Which, of course, must be rather amusing for others observing my behavior. One second I’m talking about Barry Bonds and the San Francisco Giants, and the next second I’ve got black holes in my eyes and am in full monk mode. Daydreaming is definitely the appropriate expression, since rousing me from this state is a lot like trying to wake me up: not an easy task!
So what do I think about when I’m in daydream mode? Well mostly I tell myself stories, or think about how things fit together. Now these stories definitely aren’t page turning blockbusters, they’re mostly about a problem I’ve been working on. Mentally it feels like I am constructing possible stories of how this or that problem might be resolved. Knowing X what does this imply about trying to make progress on problem P. Does it imply Y? Is Y consistent with a solution to P? Does Y fit into the story I know about problem Q? Etc. Etc.
Which leads me to the following question. How much does storytelling shape “good” thinking? (Okay, so my thinking is mostly less than “good”, but every once in a while I’m not a dufus.) For many years I’ve wondered how it might be possible to teach a class, like say, introductory mechanics (yeah I’m still a physicist at heart, you know), which teaches the physics by tracing the history of the subject. (I told this idea to some faculty well versed in physics education when I was a grad student and you should have seen them recoil in horror 🙂 ) Now, however, I’ve come to think that this desire was a misplaced projection. What I really wanted to figure out how to do was how to teach a course where the students could build up their own consistent story of what was going on. This story, of course, must be routed in all the history of the subject: you too must come to realize the trials and tribulations which led people to believe what they do. But it isn’t necesarily a history centric endeavor, but is more squarely centered on thinking up your own story. And it has got to be a story you are constantly examining and checking, i.e. which is open to repeated examination for consistency. A story which you could come to by daydreaming.
Another piece of anecdotal evidence of the role of storytelling in sharp thinking comes from my undergraduate days. When I think about my years at Caltech, one of the most fascinating events I observed was to watch those super achieving students spin yarns. It was not uncommon to spend hours at a time, taking some departing idea and then spend hours working out the consequences of this idea. Sure, some would call this simple B.S.ing and often the point of departure involved a Simpson’s episode, but in retrospect, I think that this was a great indication that deep down in these students brains, they had built up a strong consistent storytelling mechanism for thinking.
So what role does storytelling play in shaping sharp minds? Of course, I don’t know, but I’d love to hear a story which lets me understand how storytelling fits in with how our brain works. Then I could daydream about it.
[Of course this post is a grand exercise in extralusionary intelligence, for there are certainly loads of educational data on the role of storytelling in education. A quick look this morning, however, didn’t turn up anything concrete. So like any ignoramus, I’ve written this post completely unaware of the story other, more savy, researchers have been able to peice together.]
Dude, a Higs Boson?
Best quote from an article in the New York Times about the search for the Higgs boson:
Joe Lykken, a Fermilab theorist who said he first learned of the rumored bump the old-fashioned way, over lunch in the laboratory cafeteria, said: “Pre-blog, this sort of rumor would have circulated among perhaps a few dozen physicists. Now with blogs even string theorists who can’t spell Higgs became immediately aware of inside information about D Zero data.”
Zing!
I’m also very jealous of Gordon Watts, a fellow University of Washington blogger:
In response, Gordon Watts, a physicist from the University of Washington and longtime member of the D Zero team, scolded Dr. Dorigo for speculating on rumors.
“Dude! If you get called by the press to comment on this rumor — you will be making secondhand comments on rumors!” Dr. Watts wrote on his blog, Life as a Physicist.
Why am I jealous? Because he just got quoted in the New York Times, the paper of record, as saying “Dude!” Dude that rocks.
Turducken?
Juiciest paper on the arxiv yesterday? 0707.3101: “Excision Without Excision: the Relativistic Turducken” by D. Brown, O. Sarbach, E. Schnetter, M. Tiglio, P. Diener, I. Hawke, D. Pollney.
Helen Lavender Bacon, 1915-2007
Yesterday my grandmother, Helen Lavender Bacon passed away at the age of 91. Grandma Pete (as we called her, Pete being my grandparent’s dog…doesn’t everyone name their grandparents after their grandparent’s pets?) was the kindest person I have ever met in my life. I have many fond memories of my grandma, including a spectacular trip I took with my father to visit her and my grandpa in Sacramento where I got to see my dad argue a case before the California Supreme Court and woke up during the return trip on a small airplane staring directly at Mt. Shasta, but mostly I will remember standing in line with my grandma. Standing in line, you say? Pft, what a silly memory! But what you have to understand is that if you would go out to a grocery store with my grandma, and were waiting in the checkout line with her, random strangers would, unprovoked, start up conversations with you. There was something in her smile, in her body language, which just invited people into conversation. As if you could just tell that she was going to be fun to talk to and always smile at your jokes and your ideas. Whenever I see kindness, a part of my thoughts will always remember my grandmother, and standing in line.
Here is my Grandma Pete, only a few years ago, riding on the wild side:
From the Sacramento Bee:
BACON, Helen Lavender
Passed away peacefully on July 18, 2007 at age 91 in Carmichael, CA. She was preceded in death by her loving husband of 60 years, Glenn Claire Bacon and beloved son, Larry George Bacon. She is survived by son, Glenn Charles Bacon; nieces, Doris Adams and Helen Jensen; six grandchildren and three great-grandchildren. She will be deeply missed by her family and friends. Helen was born on September 11, 1915 in Hyattville, WY. She was raised in Washington state and Arizona where she was married to Glenn and gave birth to her sons. She moved to the Sacramento area in 1947 and has been a resident here since. Over this time, she has been blessed to have a huge community of caring friends who have been most kind and giving in her aging process. A celebration of Helen’s life will be held at Celtic Cross Presbyterian Church, 5839 Dewey Dr., Citrus Heights, Saturday July 21 at 1:00pm. Private interment will be at Sierra Hills East Lawn Memorial Park. Helen (Mom, Grandma) was a source of loving kindness for everyone she touched. In lieu of flowers, an appropriate remembrance would be an intentional act of kindness on her behalf.
Published in the Sacramento Bee on 7/19/2007.
Many Universes, But Not All Lead to Salvation or the Simpson's Movie
It
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=OL50ddCSJmo[/youtube]
is
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=q-O7Nteshv4[/youtube]
coming!
[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=3r-YJOrY28w[/youtube]
Maybe, finally, after all these years of waiting, we will learn just exactly what “Quantum Presbyterianism” is:
Homer: [opens door to find Kang and Kodos standing there] Hello — oh great. Mormons.
Kang: Actually, we’re Quantum Presbyterians…
I’m thinking it involves a doctrine which says that you are spiritually doomed to branches of the wavefunction which are condemned by God, but the divine intervention of God can lead you to those branches which are not condemned. Or something like that.
“Spider pig, spider pig…”
Bacon!!!!
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdF9liwZfuI[/youtube]
The Quantum Theory of Dick Cheney
Doctor Wilbur Von Philbert explains the laws of the quantum cheneyverse. Surely a theory of quantum government will appear on the arxiv soon, no?
Update: Robin points out this relevant link.
Teleportation? Beam Me Up, But Do It Coherently?
This news article, led me to this website, describing a scheme (arXiv:0706.0062, “Teleportation of massive particles without shared entanglement” A. S. Bradley, M. K. Olsen, S. A. Haine and J. J. Hope) for transporting matter waves between two remote BECs. The basic idea is a setup where mater wave gets converted into information in photons which then gets written back onto another BEC. A very cool idea (if probably experimentally challenging!) However, in all of the above the articles, the experiment is described as “teleportation.” Now don’t get me wrong, I think the experiment would be very cool if you could pull it off, but does this type of setting really deserve the moniker of “teleportation”? Now normally I would call a setup like what they authors describe a quantum state transfer protocol and not teleportation. In teleportation you use entanglment and classical communication to transmit quantum information. In the above setting you swap the information from the matter wave to the light field and then back out again, with no use of entanglment or classical communication. The authors, probably sensing the existence of 32-year-old-curmudgeons like me, write
Although our scheme is quite distinct from what is normally termed quantum teleportation,
we feel that it is closer in spirit to the original fictional concept and so will use the term to describe our system.
Okay, so we could argue about this nomenclature until we turn ourselves into chemists. But the real question, I think, is not one of naming rights (although seeing as how the preprint is PRL pages long, and that damn APS journal is the king of the pedantic, there might be some interesting editor/author wrestling matches ahead.) No, the real question is whether the experiment described above is actually close in spirit to the original fictional concept!
So which is more like Star Trek teleportation? The teleportation ideas of Bennett et al. which use entanglement and classical communication or the “teleportation” ideas described above?
On the Presentation of Data
This talk from TED2006 by Hans Rosling demonstrates some pretty cool visualization of data software which you can play with here.
Reviewing Ratio?
Since that last poll got more than three total responses, and I’m here refereeing a paper, here is another poll for your amusement:
[poll=3]