Scammed?

Joe points me to a review of Lee Smolin’s new book The Trouble with Physics by none other than Peter Shor:

The string theorists were scammed!, September 25, 2006
Reviewer: Peter W. Shor (Wellesley, MA USA) – See all my reviews

The part of the book I found most interesting was the part which tells how the string theorists were scammed by Nature (or Mathematics). Of course, Smolin doesn’t put it exactly like this, but imagine the following conversation.

String theorists: We’ve got the Standard Model, and it works great, but it doesn’t include gravity, and it doesn’t explain lots of other stuff, like why all the elementary particles have the masses they do. We need a new, broader theory.

Nature: Here’s a great new theory I can sell you. It combines quantum field theory and gravity, and there’s only one adjustable parameter in it, so all you have to do is find the right value of that parameter, and the Standard Model will pop right out.

String theorists: We’ll take it.

String theorists (some time later): Wait a minute, Nature, our new theory won’t fit into our driveway. String theory has ten dimensions, and our driveway only has four.

Nature: I can sell you a Calabi-Yau manifold. These are really neat gadgets, and they’ll fold up string theory into four dimensions, no problem.

String theorists: We’ll take one of those as well, please.

Nature: Happy to help.

String theorists (some time later): Wait a minute, Nature, there’s too many different ways to fold our Calabi-Yao manifold up. And it keeps trying to come unfolded. And string theory is only compatible with a negative cosmological constant, and we own a positive one.

Nature: No problem. Just let me tie this Calabi-Yao manifold up with some strings and branes, and maybe a little duct tape, and you’ll be all set.

String theorists: But our beautiful new theory is so ugly now!

Nature: Ah! But the Anthropic Principle says that all the best theories are ugly.

String theorists: It does?

Nature: It does. And once you make it the fashion to be ugly, you’ll ensure that other theories will never beat you in beauty contests.

String theorists: Hooray! Hooray! Look at our beautiful new theory.

Okay, I’ve taken a few liberties here. But according to Smolin’s book, string theory did start out looking like a very promising theory. And, like a scam, as it looks less and less promising, it’s hard to resist the temptation to throw good money (or research) after bad in the hope of getting something back for your return. One of the questions Smolin addresses in the rest of the book is why the theoretical physics community has kept with string theory and largely abandoned all the other approaches to quantum gravity. The short answer is that it’s hard to admit that you’ve been scammed. The long answer is much more complicated. Another thing Smolin addresses in the book is other approaches to quantum gravity. And as could be predicted, he gives lots of space to his own approach and too little space to others, especially Alain Connes’ non-commutative geometry. But overall, I found it very worthwhile and entertaining, and a good explanation as to how theoretical physics came to be in the state it is today.

Smolin was in Seattle recently, but unfortunately I was away at the time. It would have been fun to ask him about his recent paper and also about his mysterious comments in his book that “time” is the key to a great leap forward in quantum gravity.

This entry was posted in Physics. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Scammed?

  1. Joe says:

    doubly funny if you read the “Hooray” line in the voice of Lewis Black…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  2. Ro says:

    Ohhhh….it took me a few lines to figure out that you didn’t mean “Nature”, the magazine. I was all excited about finding another reason to hate them.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. wolfgang says:

    Dave,

    I just finished Lee’s book and I think this review sums it up nicely. Except that instead of “Nature” one should put “math” or actually “physicists’ math” 😎

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Dave Bacon says:

    Wolfgagn, are you going to throw you’re hat into the fire and review the book?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. wolfgang says:

    Dave,

    I might, but only if I can add something non-trivial to the already large number of reviews …

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  6. Kuas says:

    That’s the best description of the history of string theory I’ve heard (spoken as a former string theorist).

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  7. wolfgang says:

    So, I actually wrote something, but nor really a full review. Let me know if there is something I missed in your opinion and I may add an update…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  8. Tommaso says:

    LOL!

    Thanks for sharing this, but my wife (I’m in bed and while I’m surfing she’s watching “Doctor House”) gave me a rather perplexed look as I burst out in laughter… I deem you responsible if she gets a divorce.
    T.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  9. Emma Hill says:

    I love Dr. House and i always watch this TV series after my day job.:*”

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *