All Me, All the Time, Yuck!

Because, of course, you’ve all been wondering about goings on in my life. Of couse you have, that’s why you’re wasting your time reading blogs on the intertubes, no?

  • Look, I’m a small part physicist! Which part has yet to be determined.
  • Please, please, do not let bacn catch on. (Thanks to Brian for pointing me to this link.)
  • Anyone else going to AQIS 2007 on United Flight 0885, SFO to KIX, 12:30pm Sep 1? Over eleven hours in an airplane sounds like fun doesn’t it?
  • The two trips I took this summer, to Panama and to Orcas Island, have both coincided with resignations from the Bush white house (Gonzales and Rove.) If anyone wants to get rid of Dick Cheney, they might consider sending me on a trip 🙂
  • The tomatos have grown tall, a mole is attacking our yard, the puppy ate a pillow and dug many holes, the wine needs to be bottle before I leave for Japan, and I broke the toilet trying to fix the thing I broke when I was trying to fix that other thing which broke. Yes, life at Villa Sophia is good.

Panama New Paper Dance

Paper dance. Delayed posting here about the paper dance because I did the paper dance in Bocas de Toro in Panama. “Panama! Panama ah ah ah! … Model citizen, zero discipline.” New paper, arXiv:0708.1221 (scirate here):

Title: Caching in matrix product algorithms
Authors: Gregory M. Crosswhite and Dave Bacon
Abstract: A new type of diagram is introduced for visualizing matrix product states which makes transparent a connection between matrix product states and complex weighted finite state automata. It is then shown how one can proceed in the opposite direction: writing an automata that “generates” an operator gives one an immediate matrix factorization of it. Matrix product factorizations are shown to have the advantage of reducing the cost of computing expectation values by facilitating caching of intermediate calculations. Finally, these techniques are generalized to the case of multiple dimensions

Research Grant Dollars

Over at Life as a Physicist Gordon Watts notes the email we received here at the University of Washington from our university president yesterday which told us that last year, for the first time, UW received over a billion dollars in research grants. Only John Hopkins receives more money. Of course the main reason for this is the UW’s school of medicine which brings in over half a billion dollars in funding every year. Holy moly that’s a lot of research grant dollars.
This got me thinking about research funding and I thought an incredibly stupid thought. Which is of course what this blog is for: sharing my incredibly stupid thoughts…in the public…so everyone can laugh at me. A big issue which comes up in physics graduate programs is the fact that the supply chain for academic jobs in physics is severely out of wack. The number of faculty positions versus the number of people who want these jobs is the source of an incredible amount of frustration and pain for the vast majority of graduate students and postdocs who will not obtain faculty positions. This is, of course, true across a multitude of fields, not just physics, but I’ll stick to physics as it is the field I know more about.
Of course part of the problem is that the incentive system for faculty members is askew: you get rewarded for bringing in money which supports graduate students. So in some form, the number of graduate students you mentor is a proxy for a measure of your success as a faculty member. Indeed there is very little incentive for a professor at a research institute to not add even more graduate students to the meat factory of the academic job market.
Now there are many things we can think about to fix this situation, almost none of them will probably ever come to fruition, simply because there isn’t much incentive to do so from the “winners”, who are also the ones who would be responsible to fix the system. From my own perspective I’m a big advocate of science departments owning up to the problem and providing a setting where, while research and the academic system is the core of graduate school experience, departments do a lot more to emphasize the general applicability of the degree they are earning. Physics, in particular, suffers greatly from the attitude that only a faculty position at a top research school is acceptible, ignoring the huge amount of success that physicists have had departing from this path (and yes, I think about this path myself, nearly every day, especially when my research isn’t working the way I want it to. Of course this is probably the reason I’m in my current position.) Of course, I’m sure there are those who don’t think there is a problem at all. If you’re one of those people you might as well stop reading now, since there ain’t no way what I’m going to say next is going to do anything beside cause an increase in your blood pressure.
So back to the stupid idea. My position at the University of Washington is as a research assistant professor. What this means is that I am supported entirely by grant money I raise. Of course one particular side effect of this is that it is much harder for me to take on a lot of graduate students. So my stupid idea was what would happen if this setup was much more widely in place. What if faculty were rewarded a lot more for paying their own salary than they currently are? What if the proportion of research faculty was much more in line with the proportion of funding coming in to a university? What if the proportion of research faculty to faculty rewarded more for teaching was more in line with the actual source of funding dollars? This would definitely change the ability to fund graduate students at the level they are currently funded.
But, of course it is a stupid idea. Increasing the number of research professors would cause all sorts of havoc with teaching. And really, do I want more people to have to raise their salaries like I do and the suffer the slings and arrows of funding fortunes? Maybe what I really need is someone to comiserate with 🙂 But it is an interesting model to consider: what happens if a university acknowledges the central nature of research in its endeavors and tries to accomidate this by more research positions, more teaching-emphasis positions, and a reduction in the number of traditional tenure positions? I’m not sure I know the answer, but I’d be curous to know if there are any examples of schools which have pushed in this direction and what the (probably insane) consequences of such a move have been.

Daydreaming About Storytelling

I have always been a daydreamer. There isn’t a place or distraction in the world which can keep me from somehow drifting off into a daydreaming state of mind. Which, of course, must be rather amusing for others observing my behavior. One second I’m talking about Barry Bonds and the San Francisco Giants, and the next second I’ve got black holes in my eyes and am in full monk mode. Daydreaming is definitely the appropriate expression, since rousing me from this state is a lot like trying to wake me up: not an easy task!
So what do I think about when I’m in daydream mode? Well mostly I tell myself stories, or think about how things fit together. Now these stories definitely aren’t page turning blockbusters, they’re mostly about a problem I’ve been working on. Mentally it feels like I am constructing possible stories of how this or that problem might be resolved. Knowing X what does this imply about trying to make progress on problem P. Does it imply Y? Is Y consistent with a solution to P? Does Y fit into the story I know about problem Q? Etc. Etc.
Which leads me to the following question. How much does storytelling shape “good” thinking? (Okay, so my thinking is mostly less than “good”, but every once in a while I’m not a dufus.) For many years I’ve wondered how it might be possible to teach a class, like say, introductory mechanics (yeah I’m still a physicist at heart, you know), which teaches the physics by tracing the history of the subject. (I told this idea to some faculty well versed in physics education when I was a grad student and you should have seen them recoil in horror 🙂 ) Now, however, I’ve come to think that this desire was a misplaced projection. What I really wanted to figure out how to do was how to teach a course where the students could build up their own consistent story of what was going on. This story, of course, must be routed in all the history of the subject: you too must come to realize the trials and tribulations which led people to believe what they do. But it isn’t necesarily a history centric endeavor, but is more squarely centered on thinking up your own story. And it has got to be a story you are constantly examining and checking, i.e. which is open to repeated examination for consistency. A story which you could come to by daydreaming.
Another piece of anecdotal evidence of the role of storytelling in sharp thinking comes from my undergraduate days. When I think about my years at Caltech, one of the most fascinating events I observed was to watch those super achieving students spin yarns. It was not uncommon to spend hours at a time, taking some departing idea and then spend hours working out the consequences of this idea. Sure, some would call this simple B.S.ing and often the point of departure involved a Simpson’s episode, but in retrospect, I think that this was a great indication that deep down in these students brains, they had built up a strong consistent storytelling mechanism for thinking.
So what role does storytelling play in shaping sharp minds? Of course, I don’t know, but I’d love to hear a story which lets me understand how storytelling fits in with how our brain works. Then I could daydream about it.
[Of course this post is a grand exercise in extralusionary intelligence, for there are certainly loads of educational data on the role of storytelling in education. A quick look this morning, however, didn’t turn up anything concrete. So like any ignoramus, I’ve written this post completely unaware of the story other, more savy, researchers have been able to peice together.]

Helen Lavender Bacon, 1915-2007

Yesterday my grandmother, Helen Lavender Bacon passed away at the age of 91. Grandma Pete (as we called her, Pete being my grandparent’s dog…doesn’t everyone name their grandparents after their grandparent’s pets?) was the kindest person I have ever met in my life. I have many fond memories of my grandma, including a spectacular trip I took with my father to visit her and my grandpa in Sacramento where I got to see my dad argue a case before the California Supreme Court and woke up during the return trip on a small airplane staring directly at Mt. Shasta, but mostly I will remember standing in line with my grandma. Standing in line, you say? Pft, what a silly memory! But what you have to understand is that if you would go out to a grocery store with my grandma, and were waiting in the checkout line with her, random strangers would, unprovoked, start up conversations with you. There was something in her smile, in her body language, which just invited people into conversation. As if you could just tell that she was going to be fun to talk to and always smile at your jokes and your ideas. Whenever I see kindness, a part of my thoughts will always remember my grandmother, and standing in line.
Here is my Grandma Pete, only a few years ago, riding on the wild side:
Grandma Pete

From the Sacramento Bee:

BACON, Helen Lavender
Passed away peacefully on July 18, 2007 at age 91 in Carmichael, CA. She was preceded in death by her loving husband of 60 years, Glenn Claire Bacon and beloved son, Larry George Bacon. She is survived by son, Glenn Charles Bacon; nieces, Doris Adams and Helen Jensen; six grandchildren and three great-grandchildren. She will be deeply missed by her family and friends. Helen was born on September 11, 1915 in Hyattville, WY. She was raised in Washington state and Arizona where she was married to Glenn and gave birth to her sons. She moved to the Sacramento area in 1947 and has been a resident here since. Over this time, she has been blessed to have a huge community of caring friends who have been most kind and giving in her aging process. A celebration of Helen’s life will be held at Celtic Cross Presbyterian Church, 5839 Dewey Dr., Citrus Heights, Saturday July 21 at 1:00pm. Private interment will be at Sierra Hills East Lawn Memorial Park. Helen (Mom, Grandma) was a source of loving kindness for everyone she touched. In lieu of flowers, an appropriate remembrance would be an intentional act of kindness on her behalf.
Published in the Sacramento Bee on 7/19/2007.

Optimized Dancing

Tappidy, tap, tap, a new paper tap dance:

0706.4478
A Note on the Optimal Single Copy Measurement for the Hidden Subgroup Problem
Authors: Dave Bacon, Thomas Decker
Abstract: The optimization of measurements for the state distinction problem has recently been applied to the theory of quantum algorithms with considerable successes, including efficient new quantum algorithms for the non-abelian hidden subgroup problem. Previous work has identified the optimal single copy measurement for the hidden subgroup problem over abelian groups as well as for the non-abelian problem in the setting where the subgroups are restricted to be all conjugate to each other. Here we describe the optimal single copy measurement for the hidden subgroup problem when all of the subgroups of the group are given with equal a priori probability. The optimal measurement is seen to be a hybrid of the two previously discovered single copy optimal measurements for the hidden subgroup problem.

Perfect Trifecta of Negativity Constructively Interfering on my Head

Yesterday at the Perimeter Institute, while I was attending FTQC II, I developed a tremendous headache (conveniently it arose just before the panel discussion I was on started its session) which lasted into the night and is only now disipating. This headache was, I’ve concluded, the result of a perfect trifecta of downers. And because I have nothing better to do while waiting for my ride to the Toronto airport to fly back to Seattle, I thought I’d catelog these downers, for posterity, and for my own egotistical record. No one likes to hear anyone complain, heck I myself particularly hate to hear whining complaints come from someone as lucky as I’ve been, so if you’re not interested in such purging, please stop reading now. I meant it! Proceed at your own caution.
(Downer Numero 1) Being surrounded by people who are absolutely a trillion times smarter than I am. Can I ever hope to keep up with Aram Harrow, Barbara Terhal, and Daniel Gotesman? Nope, I most certainly can’t! Most of the time my wonded ego simply keeps its head down and silently wanders through the backrooms of its own extremely minor accomplishments, but yeseterday it seemed my own shortcomings decided to take refuge directly in between my temples. Ouch! Why does this matter, that I’m that much slower than everyone around me? Well certainly in a big picture it doesn’t, but it reminds me of how little I’ve actually done, and the small probabilities that I actually have of doing anything of major merit. Headache pain meter increase “plus one.”
(Downer Numero 2) Hearing about fault-tolerant quantum computing reminded me how far we are from building a quantum computer and how little we realize that we have no clue how far we are from building a quantum computer. The threshold theorem for fault-tolerant quantum computing seems, to me, a soothing balm which we can spread over our proof of principle exposed skin, but it certainly, to me at least, doesn’t seem like anything we’d remotely like to really do. And being at a conference where the whole point of the conference was to explore the realm, and only the realm, of fault-tolerance, began by the time my headache started, to drive me crazy. I think this was exacerbated by the fact that, while there were a few experimental talks (and they were excellent, of course) I have a hard time thinking about fault-tolerance without thinking about experiments. And then I start thinking about experiments and I start wishing I myself could work in a lab, because what I so desire is lots and lots of qubits, which I can tinker with and come up with new ideas for fault-tolerance in these systems. Because I’m an arrogant theorist locked up in an ivory tower, I find myself frustrated at not being able to participate in experimental progress. I want a quantum computer and I want it now, without another decade of fault-tolerant workshop to beat my head up against. Headache pain meter “plus one more.”
(Downer Numero 3) I’ve been reading The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable by Nassim Nicholas Taleb. This is the kind of book which is both infuriating and which I highly recommend. Infuriating because of the numerous points were I contend that it has gone too far to a philosophical extreme, yet at the same time highly recommended for spouting interesting takes on the world about which I wholeheartedly agree. So how can reading such a book be a downer? Because the “Black Swan”‘s of the title, the highly improbably events you didn’t see coming, remind me so much of the reason I got into this whole quantum business in the first place (or more properly remind me of the story I tell myself about why I am were I am.) In particular I got excited by quantum computing because it was a totally new and rebelious direction. Because it was new, something we hadn’t conceived of before. A new hole in the phase space of ideas, so to speak. Quantum computing was a Black Swan: who ordered Peter Shor and his factoring algorithm? And certainly there have been other quantum Black Swans, not the least of which I would say was the threshold theorem for fault-tolerant quantum computing. But at the workshop, the only swans I saw were white and swimming in the pond just outside the hulking monolithic Perimeter Institute building. Without totally new and novel approaches to fault-tolerance, or new and novel advances in quantum computing or new and novel advances from outside of the phase space of quantum computing, the whole workshop began to remind me of a fear a friend of mine described to me: “of being the scientist who works on water hexamers and goes to conferences to be patted on my back by my water
hexamer friends where we would stand in a six sided circle arms outstretched.” Headache pain meter “plus one.”
Really most days trifectas like the ones above don’t spend their time haunting my heads. But yesterday they ate up my brain, kept me up at night, and, as you can certainly tell from reading this post, made me very very grumpy. Well, I guess there is, as the saying goes, always tomorrow. When I’m hoping only a few of the trifecta pose haunts my throbing head.

Graduation Day

Today is graduation day for me. Wait, Dave, haven’t you already graduated before. Thrice? Yep, indeed, but today I get to participate in graduation from a totally different perspective. I get to be the commencement speaker for my high school graduation ceremony. Yep, Yreka High School class of 2007 gets to sit and listen to me pontifficate. Well hopefully they will survive! 🙂
The speech, or a rough approximation of what I said, is posted below the fold.
Continue reading “Graduation Day”

Balancing Work and Play

Some kids never grow up. Here for example is my nephew Marcus. Watching his uncle Dave, a very overgrown kid, balance a pipe on his nose:
Dave Balancing Act
Note the volcano in the background.