The main proof in one of my QIP submissions has developed a giant hole.
Hopefully the US Congress does a better job with its own, somewhat higher stakes, deadline. In many ways their job is easier. They can just submit the same thing as last year and they don’t need to compress their result into three pages. Unfortunately, things are not looking good for them either!
Good luck to all of us.
O brave new quantum world!
Related: check out Dave Wineland on furlough. http://www.usatoday.com/media/cinematic/video/2984899/
Don’t worry Aram, correctness is only one of the criteria considered. If the conclusions are important enough, it might be accepted anyway!
Looks like we should have submitted it, Aram.
Correctness not necessary. Rigor to the point of mortis, however, considered necessary?