A nicely written article in the New York Times about entanglement: Quantum Trickery: Testing Einstein’s Strangest Theory by Dennis Overbye (author of “Einstein in Love”.) Interestingly, the article claims that the Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen paper is now Einstein’s most cited paper. Of course a lot of this is because this is one of Einstein’s most controversial papers. But I think quantum information science has got a lot to do with this as well. Take a look at this plot from S. Redner’s physics/0407137 “Citation Statistics From More Than a Century of Physical Review”:
In 1994 Peter Shor showed quantum computetrs could factor and EPR hasn’t been the same since. Well and certainly those working in electron paramagnetic resonance have had a tougher time finding their own literature!
On a related note, for an interesting take on Einstein’s own view of the EPR paper you might be interested in reading The Shaky Game: Einstein, Realism, and the Quantum Theory by Arthur Fine (who is in the philosophy department here at UW.) One thing which Fine reveals is that it seems that Einstein wasn’t really that happy with the argument in the EPR paper.
I think part of the reason that it’s his most cited paper is that no one bothers to cite “E=mc^2” anymore. It makes me wonder: are there other ways to measure impact beyond citations (or citation based schemes, like the h-index)?
I have noticed an amazing physical phenomenon when I play bridge. When I observe my hand and it has all four aces, it invariably prevents my partner’s hand from having any. What I do with my hand affects the probability cloud of his hand, no matter how far away he is. The experiment has been done many times, with consistent results. Incredible! Action at a distance!
Ah, come on Greg. It wasn’t THAT bad. Or are you just making fun of Einstein 😉
Looks to me like the EPR citations have been, roughly, growing linearly starting in the mid-196os… Bell’s paper on inequalities and hidden variables was published in 1964. Still, perhaps the modest 3-year downtrend reversed in 1994 is some evidence for QI’s impact on EPR citations.
Howard I think you might be flipping the EPR paper and the KS (Kohn-Sham density functional theory) paper?