Via Something Similar, I discover what many of you, I’m sure, have already ascertained:
Why isn’t anyone bowing down before my nerdly godliness?
O brave new quantum world!
O brave new quantum world!
Via Something Similar, I discover what many of you, I’m sure, have already ascertained:
Why isn’t anyone bowing down before my nerdly godliness?
Crap! I only got an 84. It’s not fair, though. I wouldn’t have any scientific journal subscriptions because they’re all free! I think I lost a lot of points for never having dealt with much computer hardware (i.e., building my own machine) and for not having a computer at home. Hey, when you’re at work for >12 hours a day, you don’t WANT to check email when you get home!!!
mine’s only 76. Not that I want it to be higher, but I echo Ro’s comment about the scientific journals. Further, I’m a Mac person, but that’s because most biologists use Macs (graphics applications, sequence analysis software have traditionally been Mac, etc. I used to be a PC person, but once you go Mac you don’t go back.)
I tied with 96. The scary part is that I was hoping to score higher. Guess I’d better go buy a graphing calculator…
88. I’m a nerd, but I’m not a computer geek, and I paid the price.
Your cousin, you’ll be relieved to know, is NOT a nerd. I only scored a 12! So while we are tissue matches, we are not geekiness matches. Like I was really worried about being your equivalent in the geek factor. Wonder how your dad would have done?