| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
The Quantum Pontiff
Has moved to scienceblogs.com/pontiff
2106…
February 9, 2006 on 5:55 pm | In Computation, Funny, Quantum |Most people in quantum information science try to be sensitive to not overhyping the field. (Okay, so I get a little breathless sometimes!) This, however, is pretty amusing. I especially like
But could you imagine not using a Quantum Computer to come up with the most efficient sequence of nanobots to administer the cure to cancer.
Quantum-nano-bio!
Update: Jon brings up in the comments the word “quantum leap.” I have always found it amusing that in the Oxford English dictionary uses this example from 1977, as one of the early uses:
New Yorker 13 June 108/2 The imperial Presidency did not begin with Richard Nixon although under him abuses of the office took a quantum leap.
Of course once you find this out, you are at the OED website and you can’t help finding words like “quaquadrate” which means a sixteenth power.
6 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment
Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.
Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^

I’ve always had difficulty with the phrase ‘quantum leap’. It bothers me that it is taken to mean a significant advance when literally it would seem to describe the smallest possible advance.
Comment by Jon — 2/9/2006 #
It’s OK Jon. The mainstream media just uses a different value for Planck’s constant……
Comment by Perry Rice — 2/10/2006 #
I don’t like it when people use “light years” as a unit of time.
Comment by Suz — 2/10/2006 #
Yes, but can you make the Kessel run in under twelve parsecs?
Comment by Andrew L. — 2/10/2006 #
It depends on whether I have Chewy (spelling?) with me or not. Without that big furball, I am all talk and no action.
Comment by Dave Bacon — 2/10/2006 #
Best. SNL. Sketch. EVER…
Comment by agm — 2/10/2006 #