Master Master

During a talk today by Sid Redner, the question came up as to the origin of the expression “master equation.” According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the first such use of the term was given in by A. Nordsieck et al. in Physica 7, p. 353, 1940

The required probability of an energy distribution will be a function of the numbers ni and of x, which we will denote by W(n1, n2,..; x). From this function W one can find all other distribution functions… When the probabilities of the elementary processes are known, one can write down a continuity equation for W, from which all other equations can be derived and which we will call therefore the “master” equation.

Reality TV Show Needs Scientists

From a Caltech postdoc mailing list:

I am working on two science show teasers for Discovery and we are looking for a couple of articulate, passionate scientists who would be interested in appearing in reality television. The first show is called “Get Out of There” in which we recreate survival situations that actually occured and two scientists have to figure out how to get out/survive. The second show is called “Brain vs. Brawn” in which two contestants are both given the same challenge and one is coached on how to accomplish it by a scientist and the other by a non-scientist. The challenge we will be shooting for the pilot/teaser will be fire-walking, so ideally we will have scientist who can explain the physics behind it and the other will be a new agey-type who will focus on a more mind over matter approach. If you can recommend anyone, please contact: *******

(if you really want to know who to contact, please email me.)

Wrong Number

My friend Lon Christensen is the CTO of a company called Quorum Systems in San Diego which makes chipsets which can access both GSM and WLAN networks simultaneously. If you Google for “quorum systems” you will realize why it’s important not to name your company after a technical computer science term.

Ion Trap Milestone

The slow steady advance in ion traps! A milestone: Realization of quantum error correction,” J. Chiavernini, D. Leibfried, T. Schaetz, M. D. Barrett, R. B. Blakestad, J. Britton, W. M. Itano, J. D. Jost, E. Knill, C. Langer, R. Ozeri & D. J. Wineland, Nature 432, 602–605 (2004)

Scalable quantum computation and communication require error control to protect quantum information against unavoidable noise. Quantum error correction protects information stored in two-level quantum systems (qubits) by rectifying errors with operations conditioned on the measurement outcomes. Error-correction protocols have been implemented in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments, but the inherent limitations of this technique prevent its application to quantum information processing. Here we experimentally demonstrate quantum error correction using three beryllium atomic-ion qubits confined to a linear, multi-zone trap. An encoded one-qubit state is protected against spin-flip errors by means of a three-qubit quantum error-correcting code. A primary ion qubit is prepared in an initial state, which is then encoded into an entangled state of three physical qubits (the primary and two ancilla qubits). Errors are induced simultaneously in all qubits at various rates. The encoded state is decoded back to the primary ion one-qubit state, making error information available on the ancilla ions, which are separated from the primary ion and measured. Finally, the primary qubit state is corrected on the basis of the ancillae measurement outcome. We verify error correction by comparing the corrected final state to the uncorrected state and to the initial state. In principle, the approach enables a quantum state to be maintained by means of repeated error correction, an important step towards scalable fault-tolerant quantum computation using trapped ions.

Courage

Kiev, Ukraine, Nov. 29 (UPI) — The sign-language interpreter on a Ukrainian TV station Thursday staged a silent protest against the nation’s election by signing, “They are lying.”
During a news report on state-owned UT-1 that called Viktor Vanukovych the winner of the presidential election, Natalya Dmitruk told viewers in sign language, “I am addressing all the deaf citizens of Ukraine. Our president is (Viktor) Yushchenko. Don’t believe what they say. They are lying.”
Dmitruk then went back to signing the news report but digressed one more time at the end: “My soul is heavy that I had to repeat these lies. I will not do it again. I don’t know if we’ll see each other again.”

Damn Spam

Spam has evolved to putting subjects which will trick you into opening the email. If you email me, don’t put “hello” in the subject, cus I probably won’t open the email. If, on the other hand, you put “eigenstate” as the subject, as did the spam I received today, I will open the email. Doh!

Banned

This site, archivefreedom.org, intended to tell the story of banned arxiv posters is bound to be worth checking out every once in a while. My favorite quote so far, is in the letter to Noam Chomsky, where Carlos Castro Perelman, writes

I would like to bring to you attention the level of corruption and hypocrisy that has plagued the world of science, Physics in particular, in recent years . No wonder why this country ( USA ) is spiraling into Fascism.

Capital Ph, Capital F, spiraling into McCarthyism.

Quantum Gravity 2+1

Talking about different physical theories in different dimensions is one of physicists favorite pastimes. Thus, for instance, we often move the theory to the infinite dimensional case or to the case of dimension slightly greater or less than some integer dimension. Often we work with low dimensional theories because of constraints–for example we do this when we talk about an electron gas trapped in a two surface or a one dimensional line or even a zero dimensional dot. But sometimes we work in different dimensions to see if we can gain insight into the theory in a dimension where we can’t seem to make much progress. Such is the case for a quantum theory of gravity. Our success in understanding quantum gravity in two spatial dimensions plus one time dimension (2+1) has been far better than our success in understanding quantum gravity in three spatial dimensions plus one time dimension (3+1). Why?
Well there is an easy way to see why quantum gravity in 2+1 dimensions is quite a different beast than quantum gravity in 3+1 dimensions. Let’s look at the 3+1 dimensional case first. At a fixed time, the spatial metric has six degrees of freedom (it’s a real tensor and it’s a symmetric tensor and it’s in dimension three.) But the laws of general relativity are invariant under general coordinate changes. This means that there are four gauge degrees of freedom which correspond to the choice of four spacetime coordinates. Thus there are two physical degrees of freedom in 3+1 dimensional gravity.
But what happens in 2+1 dimensional gravity? At a fixed time, the spatial metric now has three degrees of freedom (it’s a real tensor and it’s a symmetric tensor and it’s in dimension two.) But now there are three gauge degrees of freedom. Thus in 2+1 dimensional gravity there are no physical degrees of freedom!
In fact what happens in 2+1 is that the curvature tensor vanishes! Now recall that if we parallel transport a vector around an area where the curvature tensor vanishes, then the vector doesn’t change. Thus if we work in a spacetime where there all loops encose areas, then parallel transport will be path independent and there will be a global notion of parallelism. Quite a boring theory right? Well yes, if you only consider simply connected spacetimes (i.e. spacetimes where all loops are continuously contractible to a point.) But if you consider spacetimes which have noncontractible loops (think of a torus and the circles which form circumferences of this torus) then the parallel transport around one of these noncontractible loops doesn’t enclose an area. Now the geometry of this flat spacetime is characterized by the results of parallel transport around noncontratible loops (holonomies.) So right away we see that gravity in 2+1 dimensions will be an interesting theory when we allow topologically nontrivial spacetimes. In fact, when we construct the solutions and quantize gravity in 2+1 dimensions we are led to a topological quantum field theory! Actually things get quite interesting in 2+1 dimensions when we try to quantize the theory. In fact there are many different approaches to this quantizations, and, strangely, not all of these are consistent (this is why you have to pay attention when all these mathematical physicists go on and on about all these different methods to quantize classical theories!)
Well enough quantum gravity for today. Just remember, theories of physics are never as complicated as most theoretical physicists would like you to believe.

Snow Day

When you wake up to a few inches of snow, what’s the first thing you do? Well if you’re still a kid, the first thing you do is you turn on the radio to see if school is canceled. At the Santa Fe Institute, the institute closes whenever the public schools close. So now I get to be a kid all over again and today when I woke up to some snow I quickly turned on the radio and heard that the public schools in Santa Fe were closed. Whoop! Snow day!