Robust Bacon

I’m currently visiting the Perimeter Institute for a workshop on fault-tolerant quantum computing. The workshop is great, but the coolest thing is that I get to wear a badge which calls me fault-tolerant:
ftbacon.jpg
Am I robust? I certainly don’t feel robust, indeed every day it seems entropy finds yet another way to sneak attack me 🙂

A Thesis Where?

A strange place to find a computer science dissertation: Walmart.
Update: Commentor Michael points to another interesting book for sale at Walmart. But who is this Iaac third author?

Power Laws, Power Laws, Everywhere, and Not a Ball to Kick

Boy reading the physics section of the arxiv sure has given me much amusement lately:

arXiv:0706.1758
Statistics of football dynamics
Authors: R. S. Mendes, L. C. Malacarne, C. Anteneodo
Abstract: We investigate the dynamics of football matches. Our goal is to characterize statistically the temporal sequence of ball movements in this collective sport game, searching for traits of complex behavior. Data were collected over a variety of matches in South American, European and World championships throughout 2005 and 2006. We show that the statistics of ball touches presents power-law tails and can be described by $q$-gamma distributions. To explain such behavior we propose a model that provides information on the characteristics of football dynamics. Furthermore, we discuss the statistics of duration of out-of-play intervals, not directly related to the previous scenario.

In related power law news, if you’ve got the data and want to know whether it’s power law distributed, you’d better read this:

arXiv:0706.1062
Power-law distributions in empirical data
Authors: Aaron Clauset, Cosma Rohilla Shalizi, M. E. J. Newman
Abstract: Power-law distributions occur in many situations of scientific interest and have significant consequences for our understanding of natural and man-made phenomena. Unfortunately, the empirical detection and characterization of power laws is made difficult by the large fluctuations that occur in the tail of the distribution. In particular, standard methods such as least-squares fitting are known to produce systematically biased estimates of parameters for power-law distributions and should not be used in most circumstances. Here we describe statistical techniques for making accurate parameter estimates for power-law data, based on maximum likelihood methods and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic. We also show how to tell whether the data follow a power-law distribution at all, defining quantitative measures that indicate when the power law is a reasonable fit to the data and when it is not. We demonstrate these methods by applying them to twenty-four real-world data sets from a range of different disciplines. Each of the data sets has been conjectured previously to follow a power-law distribution. In some cases we find these conjectures to be consistent with the data while in others the power law is ruled out.

Blog post about this paper at Structure and Strangeness here.

Cormac McCarthy on Oprah, End of World at 8

Interviewed on Oprah (subscription required). And yes, his latest book is about the end of the world. Inteviewed in the Santa Fe Institute library. I don’t remember it looking like that at all 🙂
Comments by SFI researchers are here.
Best part of the interview is where Cormac lectures on probability: “The laws of probability operate everywhere. That being the case, somewhere in the world there is the luckiest person.” Yes, isn’t the luckiest man’s name Rosencrantz?

[Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are riding horses down a path – they pause]
Rosencrantz: [to Guildenstern] Umm, uh…
[Guildenstern rides away, and Rosencrantz follows. Rosencrantz spots a gold coin on the ground]
Rosencrantz: [to horse] Whoa – whoa, whoa.
[Gets off horse and starts flipping the coin]
Rosencrantz: Hmmm. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads. Heads.
[Guildenstern grabs the coin, checks both sides, then tosses it back to Rosencrantz]
Rosencrantz: Heads.
[Guildenstern pulls a coin out of his own pocket and flips it]
Rosencrantz: Bet? Heads I win?
[Guildenstern looks at coin and tosses it to Rosencrantz]
Rosencrantz: Again? Heads.

Graduation Day

Today is graduation day for me. Wait, Dave, haven’t you already graduated before. Thrice? Yep, indeed, but today I get to participate in graduation from a totally different perspective. I get to be the commencement speaker for my high school graduation ceremony. Yep, Yreka High School class of 2007 gets to sit and listen to me pontifficate. Well hopefully they will survive! 🙂
The speech, or a rough approximation of what I said, is posted below the fold.
Continue reading “Graduation Day”

It Was Either Level 1 or Level 6

Is it bad that limbo doesn’t sound that bad to me?

The Dante’s Inferno Test has sent you to the First Level of Hell – Limbo!
First Level of Hell – Limbo Charon ushers you across the river Acheron, and you find yourself upon the brink of grief’s abysmal valley. You are in Limbo, a place of sorrow without torment. You encounter a seven-walled castle, and within those walls you find rolling fresh meadows illuminated by the light of reason, whereabout many shades dwell. These are the virtuous pagans, the great philosophers and authors, unbaptised children, and others unfit to enter the kingdom of heaven. You share company with Caesar, Homer, Virgil, Socrates, and Aristotle. There is no punishment here, and the atmosphere is peaceful, yet sad.

Here is how you matched up against all the levels:

Level Score
Purgatory (Repenting Believers) Very Low
Level 1 – Limbo (Virtuous Non-Believers) Very High
Level 2 (Lustful) Moderate
Level 3 (Gluttonous) Low
Level 4 (Prodigal and Avaricious) Very Low
Level 5 (Wrathful and Gloomy) Low
Level 6 – The City of Dis (Heretics) High
Level 7 (Violent) Low
Level 8- the Malebolge (Fraudulent, Malicious, Panderers) Moderate
Level 9 – Cocytus (Treacherous) Low

Take the Dante’s Inferno Hell Test