{"id":879,"date":"2005-04-13T19:05:50","date_gmt":"2005-04-14T02:05:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/?p=879"},"modified":"2005-04-13T19:05:50","modified_gmt":"2005-04-14T02:05:50","slug":"more-papers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/2005\/04\/13\/more-papers\/","title":{"rendered":"More Papers"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When it rains, it pours!  Andris points me to another interesting paper, this time by Shengyu Zhang (Princeton), <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/quant-ph\/0504085\">quant-ph\/0504085<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n<b>(Almost) tight bounds for randomized and quantum Local Search on hypercubes and grids<\/b><br \/>\nShengyu Zhang<br \/>\nThe Local Search problem, which finds a local minimum of a black-box function on a given graph, is of both practical and theoretical importance to many areas in computer science and natural sciences. In this paper, we show that for the Boolean hypercube $B^n$, the randomized query complexity of Local Search is $Theta(2^{n\/2}n^{1\/2})$ and the quantum query complexity is $Theta(2^{n\/3}n^{1\/6})$. We also show that for the constant dimensional grid $[N^{1\/d}]^d$, the randomized query complexity is $Theta(N^{1\/2})$ for $d geq 4$ and the quantum query complexity is $Theta(N^{1\/3})$ for $d geq 6$. New lower bounds for lower dimensional grids are also given. These improve the previous results by Aaronson [STOC&#8217;04], and Santha and Szegedy [STOC&#8217;04]. Finally we show for $[N^{1\/2}]^2$ a new upper bound of $O(N^{1\/4}(loglog N)^{3\/2})$ on the quantum query complexity, which implies that Local Search on grids exhibits different properties at low dimensions.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In the local search problem, one is given a graph and a function on this graph from its vertices to the natural numbers and one seeks to return a vertex such that for all of the neighbors of this vertex the function obtains a greater value on those neighboring vertices.  Here, Zhang is able to demonstrate a remarkable number of matching bounds for this problem in both the randomized classical model and the quantum model.<br \/>\nAnother interesting paper which appeared today is Michael Nielsen&#8217;s (University of Queensland) summary (plus a bit more) about cluster state quantum computing, <a href=\"http:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/quant-ph\/0504097\">quant-ph\/0504097<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\n<b>Cluster-state quantum computation<\/b><br \/>\nMichael A. Nielsen<br \/>\nThis article is a short introduction to and review of the cluster-state model of quantum computation, in which coherent quantum information processing is accomplished via a sequence of single-qubit measurements applied to a fixed quantum state known as a cluster state. We also discuss a few novel properties of the model, including a proof that the cluster state cannot occur as the exact ground state of any naturally occurring physical system, and a proof that measurements on any quantum state which is linearly prepared in one dimension can be efficiently simulated on a classical computer, and thus are not candidates for use as a substrate for quantum computation.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is a nice review, which contains some interesting bonus(!) results.  The first is that the cluster state cannot be the ground state of any two-body Hamiltonian.  This is particularly interesting because one way one might imagine realizing the cluster state is by engineering the appropriate Hamiltonian and then cooling the system a ground state which is the cluster state.  The other important result in this paper is that certain one dimensional quantum systems aren&#8217;t useful for quantum computation.  In particular one dimensional quantum systems which are prepare via a linear series of unitary evolutions can be efficiently simulated on a classical computer.  Michael shows that this is true for qubit circuits, I wonder how this scales when we replace these qubits by qudits?  Also I see there is a note about this later result also being shown by Steve Flammia (University of New Mexico), Bryan Eastin(University of New Mexico), and Andrew Doherty(University of Queensland). (Correction: it seems I can&#8217;t parse a sentence.  The later result is joint work with Andrew Doherty(University of Queensland) while Steve and Brian are acknowledge for introducing clusters states to the qcircut latex package.)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When it rains, it pours! Andris points me to another interesting paper, this time by Shengyu Zhang (Princeton), quant-ph\/0504085: (Almost) tight bounds for randomized and quantum Local Search on hypercubes and grids Shengyu Zhang The Local Search problem, which finds a local minimum of a black-box function on a given graph, is of both practical &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/2005\/04\/13\/more-papers\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;More Papers&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[20,63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-879","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-computer-science","category-quantum"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/879","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=879"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/879\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=879"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=879"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=879"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}