{"id":3643,"date":"2009-09-11T11:37:53","date_gmt":"2009-09-11T18:37:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/?p=3643"},"modified":"2009-09-11T11:37:53","modified_gmt":"2009-09-11T18:37:53","slug":"krugman-im-for-math","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/2009\/09\/11\/krugman-im-for-math\/","title":{"rendered":"Krugman: I&#039;m For Math!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Krugman clarifies:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve been getting some comments from people who think my magazine piece was an attack on the use of mathematics in economics. It wasn&#8217;t&#8230;So by all means let&#8217;s have math in economics &#8212; but as our servant, not our master.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Word.<br \/>\n(Of course the point I was trying to make was that I read the end of his article as suggesting that <em>because<\/em> economics must deal with the irrational and unpredictable behavior of humans, that it must therefor be <em>messy<\/em> and beyond elegant mathematical description.  I don&#8217;t buy this line of reasoning, as I think it is <em>unknown<\/em> whether the conclusion is true, but apparently, reading comments to my article, I&#8217;m the only one who doesn&#8217;t like to put his mathematics before his solution \ud83d\ude42 )<br \/>\nBut anyway, is anyone going to explain inflation without using gauge theory?  (Channeling Eric Weinstein)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Krugman clarifies: I&#8217;ve been getting some comments from people who think my magazine piece was an attack on the use of mathematics in economics. It wasn&#8217;t&#8230;So by all means let&#8217;s have math in economics &#8212; but as our servant, not our master. Word. (Of course the point I was trying to make was that I &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/2009\/09\/11\/krugman-im-for-math\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Krugman: I&#039;m For Math!&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[26,41],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3643","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics","category-mathematics"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3643","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3643"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3643\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3643"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3643"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3643"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}