{"id":1003,"date":"2005-08-09T09:51:35","date_gmt":"2005-08-09T16:51:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/?p=1003"},"modified":"2005-08-09T09:51:35","modified_gmt":"2005-08-09T16:51:35","slug":"foundations-of-quantum-theory-quantum-gravity-and-quantum-computing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/2005\/08\/09\/foundations-of-quantum-theory-quantum-gravity-and-quantum-computing\/","title":{"rendered":"Foundations of Quantum Theory, Quantum Gravity, and Quantum Computing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On a couple of blogs (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.math.columbia.edu\/~woit\/wordpress\/?p=236\">Not Even Wrong<\/a> and Lubo\u0161 Motl&#8217;s reference frame) a question has creeped up which is what role studies of the foundations of quantum theory have in a future theory of quantum gravity.  At the Strings2005  conference in Toronto recently, this question was raised during a panel discussion.  When someone claimed that foundations hasn&#8217;t contributed anything to physics, Lee Smolin apparently said something to the effect that study of foundations of quantum theory has given us quantum computing.<br \/>\nIt is true that the original thinkers about quantum computers, and in particular I&#8217;m thinking about David Deutsch, where inspired by interpretation issues in quantum theory.  But I think the relationship between foundational studies of quantum theory and what is now quantum information science is a bit different.  I think that foundational studies have played the role of a &#8220;clarifier&#8221; in quantum information science.  Instead of many results being motivated by foundational issues directly, studies in foundations have lead those in quantum computing to a better understanding of what quantum theory is and what it is not.  I certainly think that banging my head up against the different interpretations of quantum theory has given me a very good grasp of the limits of what quantum theory can say and what it cannot say.  Thus I think that quantum information science has benefited immensely by listening to the foundation crowd and learning just exactly what is so different about quantum theory.  So, while the interpretations themselves don&#8217;t have any gigantic successes (one could argue for smaller ones!), I think they are an essential base which betters the field of quantum computing.<br \/>\nNow back to quantum gravity.  Whether or not the foundations of quantum theory has anything to say about quantum gravity, I think, is a question we can debate until the cows come in.  There are certainly very good philosophical points of view that the strain between gravity and quantum theory must be broken in some nontrivial manner, and whether we break quantum theory or gravity is, I think, an intriguing question.  But if we take quantum computing as an example, the lesson that may be learned is that by careful study of quantum theory you can gain an appreciation for it which might allow you to make progress in forming a quantum theory of gravity.  I must say that I am often shocked by the lack of understanding of the details of quantum theory among high energy physicists.  Sure they use it every day.  But do they really deeply get the theory and what it can and can not do?  Of course this is a very prejudiced statement coming from a very prejudiced quantum computing dude.  We hold quantum theory fairly sacred and hate to see it abused.  I&#8217;m also sure that high energy physicists are greatly pained by quantum information scientists lack of understanding of &#8220;real&#8221; physics!<br \/>\nMy person views on the relationship between foundations and quantum gravity are about as close as I get to pseudoscientific gobldy-gook.  I gave a talk on those views once.  It was supposed to be one hour and it ran to two.  Sometimes I contemplate writing a book about these views&#8230;  Penrose did it, so why can&#8217;t I? \ud83d\ude09<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On a couple of blogs (Not Even Wrong and Lubo\u0161 Motl&#8217;s reference frame) a question has creeped up which is what role studies of the foundations of quantum theory have in a future theory of quantum gravity. At the Strings2005 conference in Toronto recently, this question was raised during a panel discussion. When someone claimed &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/2005\/08\/09\/foundations-of-quantum-theory-quantum-gravity-and-quantum-computing\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Foundations of Quantum Theory, Quantum Gravity, and Quantum Computing&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[20,53,63],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1003","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-computer-science","category-physics","category-quantum"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1003","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1003"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1003\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1003"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1003"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dabacon.org\/pontiff\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1003"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}