This This and This

When I read articles by creation scientists and there ilk I’m often filled with a feeling of “how the heck can you believe that, surely you’ve heard about this, this, and this.” Invariably they have none read of the “this”‘s. Yesterday I gave a talk at the Santa Fe Institute’s Complex Systems Summer School on quantum computation. And after the talk, I was having a discussion with someone about quantum computing. And they said they still thought quantum computers are not a valid model of computation. And I was thinking to myself, “But surely you’ve read this, this, this, this, this, and this? Just to name a few.” Never thought I’d be having these thoughts around another scientist.

4 Replies to “This This and This”

  1. I guess in a field where there is math and the possibility of proofs, it is harder to find rational justification for technically informed, educated people to disagree.
    In my field, which is becoming harder to define – maybe medical functional genomics or functional genomics of immunology – no one agrees on much. We don’t even have a complete inventory of the parts, much less know what they do in a true mechanistic sense.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *