Rounding Error in the Defense Budget

I recently (and somewhat belatedly) came across the following news item:

NASA gets two military spy telescopes for astronomy

The gist of the article is that the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) just donated two telescopes with greater optical capabilities than the Hubble space telescope. For free.

Ironically, NASA may not have the budget to actually put the telescopes into space and run them. This is sort of like if someone sees that you’re parched with thirst, and they decide to give you a bottle of wine that they aren’t interested in drinking anymore, because presumably they have much better wine now. But you’re too poor to afford a bottle opener.

The Hubble cost a lot of money to build. The low-end estimate is USD $2.5 billion, but that is probably an underestimate by a factor of 2. That’s a lot of money, but it will barely buy you a week in Iraq, if you’re the US military.

Let’s assume that the cost to build those telescopes was approximately the same as the Hubble. This means that the cost of the two NRO telescopes combined is about the same as the entire $7 billion budget of the NSF for FY2012.

Of course, US science does get money from the Department of Defense. But the “pure” science budget for the entire US is just a rounding error compared to the total DoD budget.

This entry was posted in $$$, Science. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Rounding Error in the Defense Budget

  1. Spiros M. says:

    Steve, are you suggesting that the military has so much money that they already have a 2048-qubit fault-tolerant quantum computer? Simply by brute force?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Dave Bacon says:

    What benefit is the Hubble space telescope? Does it help me make more money? Wait. Sorry. Thought I was commenting on Hacker News.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

  3. Melvin says:

    NASA could do the equivalent of this: http://youtu.be/YAx2TXt1v_I . I guess you are talking about two satellites, so one will need a really big shoe…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. Pingback: This post was supported by Goldman-Sachs Grant No. GS98039 | The Quantum Pontiff

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>