Since that last poll got more than three total responses, and I’m here refereeing a paper, here is another poll for your amusement:
[poll=3]
Subscribe
The Quantum Pontiffs
Pontifex Praeteritorum
Quantum Announcements
Recent Comments
- rrtucci on Resolution of Toom’s rule paradox
- aram on 4 Pages
- David Poulin on 4 Pages
- Steve on 4 Pages
- Test your Intuition/Knowledge: What was Lord Kelvin’s Main Mistake? | Combinatorics and more on Test your intuition
- Hamish Johnston on El Naschie works on entanglement now
- aram on El Naschie works on entanglement now
- sflammia on El Naschie works on entanglement now
Is it possible to view the results of this poll in the original order instead of being sorted by number of votes?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Hmmm, this seems a bit ambiguous. When you say X reviewed for every Y submitted, if X>Y do you mean that each paper is reviewed multiple times, or do you mean that Y are rejected without review for every X reviewed?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
What I meant was how many papers X do you review for every Y that you submit. I guess I count “reviewing” a paper as the entire process for one paper, i.e. if it gets sent back to you then its still just one review.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
D’oh! I completely misread that title.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0